• About…George Matlock

eurosnews

~ Euro crisis solved, not merely explained

eurosnews

Tag Archives: inflation

Brexit at any price?

01 Thursday Dec 2016

Posted by eurosnews in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

article 50, austerity, bailout, Bank of England, banks, Brexit, Brussels, crisis, David Cameron, debt, ECB, economy, Enda Kenny, EU, euro, Europe, European Union, eurozone, Gary Lineker, Germany, inflation, investors, Ireland, Italy, Labour, Lisbon, Mark Carney, migration, NAFTA, Northern Ireland, Poland, politics, recession, referendum, reparations, Scotland, Singapore, Strabourg, Theresa May, UK, UKIP, vote, wealth, Zac Goldsmith

Sunny weather favours the Tories. But what about a rebel standing as an Independent?

Sunny weather doesn’t favour the Tories. But what about a rebel standing as an Independent?

In the five months since the initial Brexit fallout, the mud-slinging has continued from both the UK and European Union camps. None of it helpful, yet the UK government is unwilling to discuss in detail what it plans to do.

I have consistently argued that Brexit for the sake of a Brexit is not an option. We should never leave a club that has brought us benefits – as well as pains – just because we now can.

The referendum certainly gave the government the moral mandate it needed to proceed. But that doesn’t make a hard and fast Brexit right.

Rewind: People voted for Brexit in order to see an improvement in their standards of living. They didn’t do it because they wanted all foreigners out (as that might include one’s wife!) or because they know the horrors of largesse in Brussels.

These were contributory factors yes. But they were not the point. People believed that a protest vote was needed to shake up the EU. They also wanted to see more checks on whom we allow to settle in the UK. But principally the extra 1 million people who voted for Brexit rather than Remain were poorer income groups who felt ignored by Westminster let alone some foreign place called Brussels or Strasbourg.

They cried out for change and saw this as the only chance. Even if they had little clue exactly what change it would bring. Despite their uncertainty – because even the UK government had no real policy of a post-Brexit Britain – voters did not vote for chaos, a 20% decline in sterling that makes the 1967 devaluation looks positively lightweight, nor increased racial hatred that has accompanied all this. Nor did they vote for what might end up shredding another Union, the United Kingdom, as regions as well as Scotland and Northern Ireland see their vote ignored by London.

While data so far has been buoyant and some economists have sought to repent for making mistakes forecasting an economic disaster following Brexit, it could also be argued that they were simply a little too hasty to predict – but also to apologise.

All the good data so far has been historic. It takes time for an economic disaster to gather momentum. A robust developed economy like Britain won’t suffer overnight Armageddon but rather as some forecast before the June referendum, a slow motion train crash.

So it is foolhardy to rubbish Governor Mark Carney or the Bank of England for their dire predictions. Certainly, the Bank still believes inflation will go up next year and prices might even rise at their fastest pace for any period since 1945 unless sterling’s decline is corrected soon.

For that correction to take place, the government will have to be more open and less hasty to Brexit. When Prime Minister Theresa May told her party faithful at conference in October what she planned to do and announced she would trigger Article 50 by the end of March 2017 it shocked and confused a lot of people. Why by March? What is the hurry?

Enda Kenny, the Irish premier, said in the past few days that he doubts Brexit talks will conclude in two years but rather five years. Another realist who can see the folly of another EU regulation agreed to in Lisbon in 2009.

But the only conceivable reason for May’s hurry is that talks are expected to conclude within a 24-month period of the trigger. That takes us through to March or April 2019. May might be feeling that with a slender government majority, the risk of further MP defections or by-elections the government could be forced into an earlier election. And don’t forget that my own MP Zac Goldsmith is standing for re-election today as a Heathrow expansion protest as an Independent but who sadly will be at risk of losing his seat over his Brexit views not shared as widely by Londoners who will vote in Richmond Park. But at least from one ballot paper we saw this morning, someone forgot to put it into the box and as an impromptu exit poll it marked Zac on the ballot paper!

That is why some have even called for May to call a snap election now while she still commands some respect from the electorate.

Certainly, it would make far more sense to trigger Article 50 on a day in the future when sterling has stabilised and preferably regained some of its lost strength.

The government and its advisers are held bent on telling us constantly that “it would be unhelpful for the British government to provide a running commentary on Brexit negotiations”.

We hear that all the time and as though someone is trying to drum it into our heads. Like in all forms of torture and indoctrination – say it enough times and people start to believe you.

Stand back from the hub-bub and ask yourself Why?

The government is using “running commentary” as a shield to protect itself, for its own convenience of not having to be accountable. It appeases the right wing in the ruling Conservative Party as well as its provocateurs, UKIP.

Having won the people’s vote for a Brexit, the government now thinks it can do everything itself. Well, on December 5 the government plans to appeal a Court order that said Parliament should have a say in Brexit and vote on it not merely discuss it and allow the government free will.

With the vote to leave close 52% to 48% on a high turnout, it is understandable the courts feel uneasy about allowing the government to have easy passage on this.

It is a decision that will affect millions of people for generations to come. Although not irreversible in 50 years the damage could be very much done if we make a Brexit on any terms.

People aren’t that dogmatic and I would imagine that they have had some regrets about voting for Brexit IF they had any idea it would play out this way.

A nation famed for its tolerance and conservatism with a small “C”, “Britain is fast becoming a dystopia” as TV pundit Gary Lineker aptly put it after the court ruling and his tweet of support when the public turned against him.

While it is true that the EU has some difficult issues it needs to soul-search over – such as its insistence over labour mobility – Britain too needs to think hard about what it hopes to achieve.

As I have argued often since June, premier May could simply note the referendum decision and then proceed to choose a time in the future when to trigger Article 50 once we have a solid policy in place and sterling has been repaired.

But having rashly gone for a deadline of end of March 2017 to trigger Article 50 we should be discussing the negotiations process and what we hope to achieve from it. Even if Europe doesn’t want to discuss anything before we trigger – a means to weaken us – we as a nation should debate.

We cannot trust one Cabinet inside a government to make all these huge decisions and sacrifices on our behalf. We must not assume that they are somehow the Ten Wise Men. They are politicians, as susceptible to being gullible and short-sighted and stubborn as any other human being.

Moreover, how practical is it to even imagine blocking debate?

The government might want to get into the history books as the ones who helped us Brexit but that is a hollow victory if Britain suffers.

The French want us to start talks as soon as possible so that we are in a weak position with a low sterling exchange rate. The French can be short-sighted. It was the French too who wanted to punish Germany for World War One by demanding high reparations at Versailles in 1919. It resulted in years of chaos and resentment in Germany which led to the Third Reich within 20 years. Not smart.

Any effort to damage Britain now will actually come to make all of Europe suffer later. We have been down that road. It will limit German car exports to one of the nation’s most important markets, the UK. It will lead to European workers having reduced rights in Britain as well as Britons in Europe. Tit for tat. That’s ever so Cold War!

Of course, it is also true that apart from a healthy engagement and debate with the people of Britain by the UK government, the EU needs to have a debate within its own ranks and its own peoples.

Both the British government and top EU brass seem impervious to that.

While the Italian constitutional reform referendum isn’t a vote to leave the EU on December 4 but to speed up how Parliament functions with a slimmed down Senate, so too Europe needs to address a more fundamental question: migration.

The EU says it cannot function without migration. Why? It is true that many low-skilled workers have un-burdened Europe by coming to the UK to seek work. And it has been good for keeping down wages in agriculture in the UK too.

But look more widely and you will see that migration is a principle peculiar to the EU and outmoded by the risks of new threats such as terrorism.

Already the EU has a problem on its eastern border. Having criticised Turkey’s Erdogan for the way he has been heavy-handed with the aftermath of this year’s failed coup and reacted by suspending talks on Turkey joining the club, Erdogan has threatened to release millions of immigrants into the EU unless Brussels changes its mind.

It does rather show what a magnet for migration the EU has become.

Yet if you look at the North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA), now under review from a new populist President-elect Donald Trump, or south east Asia’s trade area, it is apparent that you can have free trade and prosperity without migration.

In Asia, Singapore will allow daily guest workers to flood in from Malaysia but won’t grant settlement rights. The whole region prospers and there is no friction between communities about migration.

Trump may well kill off NAFTA but a pity if he does. There is some debate over whether NAFTA has brought America benefits or just grief and joblessness. That in itself doesn’t mean trade areas are a bad thing or that the EU should be disbanded. Only that it needs to be drafted smartly and respected by all who participate in it.

So the bottom line? We need a fair and effective trade agreement without migration as the pre-condition. We should accept other nationals based on the skills they bring. We also need to enter into negotiations over Britain’s future by being more transparent and open. Anyone who says we can’t have a running commentary is trying to hide something.

The future of Europe is simply too big to be debated in a Cabinet without checks and balances. We owe it to the children of all Europe to get this right.

Wage-obsessed rate hikes are badly-timed

24 Friday Jul 2015

Posted by eurosnews in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

assets, Athens, austerity, bailout, Bank of England, banks, bonds, borrowing, crisis, Cyprus, debt, debt crisis, default, ECB, economy, EU, euro, Europe, European Union, eurozone, Federal Reserve, FOMC, George Osborne, greece, HSBC, inflation, interest rates, investors, Labour, politics, recession, steven major, UK, US, wealth

UK and US interest rates sit at historic lows, where they have been snug for years. So does inflation. Yet now the hawks are beginning to win the argument for raising the price of credit. The problem is, that the reasoning behind such moves is flawed by its emphasis only on some of the factors that matter. Namely wages growth.

You would think that with Greece still teetering on the edge of collapse – the next bailout has not yet been agreed – and China pumping liquidity into its markets to stave off bourse collapse, and a general worry about whether Greece’s crisis can be contained or will spread to other parts of Europe, this really isn’t the right time to be talking up rates. Even talking them up, getting money markets all excited, let alone actually hiking rates!

Nevertheless, UK interest rates could rise by February 2016, all because of an obsession with rising labour costs.

According to the hawks, and even some of the neutral voters on the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee, a pip higher in wages, growing at their fastest rate since 2007 when the financial crisis began, is justification to talk up rates.

Meanwhile, there is talk of a US rate hike as soon as September – late July at the FOMC’s next meeting is rather unlikely – which only helps to fuel speculation.

Markets, however, aren’t in a hurry to price in a rate hike. Neither in the US nor UK, so some sanity still prevails.

In fact, two-year US Treasuries have not repeated the actions of previous tightening cycles. In 1994, 1999 and again in 2004 yields jumped as prices fell at the front end of US government debt’s yield curve. Rather, at 0.7% the two-year US T-Note yield is at the same level it was anchored at during late 2008 at the height of the banking leg of the crisis with the Lehman Brothers collapse. In other words, yields are pretty much as low as they have been during the crisis nestled next to historically low interest rates at a range of zero to 0.25%. Markets still price in crisis rather than recovery and inflation.

It would appear US Treasuries and UK gilts are calling the bluff of their respective central banks. That’s also helping contain a re-pricing of mortgage and other interest rate-sensitive products.

And so they might. At present the notion of rising wages is fraught with problems. For one thing, most workers have had at very best flat real wage growth since 2007. But for many in the public sector and beyond, pay gains have reversed, leading to a real income drop if you take into account a modest inflation rate, which only recently dropped to zero. Even a rise in tax allowances is pegged to inflation, so hardly a generous pay rise has been enjoyed by most workers.

Perhaps ironically, the only pay rise that UK labour will record is Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne’s planned introduction of the national Living Wage, which comes in higher than the current national minimum wage.

At present, the UK’s national minimum wage for over 18 year olds among the 10 Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development nations who enforce them stands at a paltry USD8/hour. Only the United States at USD7.30 and Canada at USD7.80 stand lower. Low-tax-put-the-burden-on-employers haven Luxembourg offers the highest, at USD10.80.

Given that Eurozone borrowing has jus hit a fresh record high of 92.9 per cent in the first quarter of 2015 from 92% in Q4 2014, according to figures from Eurostat, the EU’s statistical agency, this is alarming when the UK and US are talking up rates.

Why? Well, as Steven Major, head of fixed income research at HSBC, has elegantly explained, the debt increase among eurozone nations is “opportunistic borrowing”. These nations are keen to capture and lock-in debt at the current historically low interest rates in the eurozone, UK and US.

But as we all know, that is not necessarily fiscally-responsible. When the debt comes to be rolled over, a few years down the road, when rates begin to rise across the spectrum. Those same governments will be gambling that economic growth and tax receipts prevailing then will offset the fact they need to pay more back to hold onto debt or to redeem the debt. Risky.

← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • Actions Overtake The Blog
  • Better Brexit Communications Needed
  • Review Brexit deal after five years
  • Brexit – Nobody Does It Better
  • Barnier’s Barnstorm

Archives

  • September 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • January 2018
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012

Categories

  • EMEA
  • Financial, Markets, Investments
  • global
  • Global ex Europe
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Where on Social?

  • View georgematlock’s profile on Twitter
  • View georgematlock’s profile on LinkedIn

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,224 other followers

Follow eurosnews on WordPress.com

Tags

Alex Salmond Angela Merkel assets Athens austerity Austria bailout Bank of England banks bonds Boris Johnson Brexit Britain Bunds Cameron crisis Cyprus David Cameron debt debt crisis default democracy ECB economy Ed Miliband EFSF election elections EU euro euro currency Europe European Union euro zone eurozone Federal Reserve France George Osborne Germany greece housing IMF independence inflation interest rates International Monetary Fund investors Ireland Italy Labour London Margaret Thatcher Mark Carney Merkel Nigel Farage Oil Poland politics Portugal RBS recession referendum regulation restructuring Reuters Scotland Spain tax Theresa May UK UKIP US vote wealth Westminster

EURO CRISIS FEED

  • Eurozone Crisis Feed Eurozone Crisis Feed is supplied by breakingnews.com. eurosnews blog takes no responsibility for the accuracy of its content and accepts no liability for the suitability or consequences of the feed’s content.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Our Cookie Policy